New Approach to Solving the Schrödinger Equation Presented at Kraków Workshop

New Approach to Solving the Schrödinger Equation Presented at Kraków Workshop

New Approach to Solving the Schrödinger Equation Presented at Kraków Workshop

Jul 15, 2025

Introduction

A recent scientific workshop titled "Statistical Physics and Quanta" at the Polish Academy of Sciences in Kraków featured the presentation of a new quantum algorithmic proposal for solving the Schrödinger equation. Dr. Grzegorz Rajchel-Mieldzioć – a quantum information researcher at BEIT – along with collaborators Dr. Emil Żak and Dr. Szymon Pliś, presented their results on a novel method designed to tackle one of quantum physics’ fundamental computational challenges. The team’s new approach aims to efficiently determine multiple solutions of the Schrödinger equation (i.e. the allowed energy levels of a quantum system) using quantum computing techniques. The presentation avoided hype and focused on the technical details of the algorithm, which is described in a recent preprint.

This development is noteworthy because solving the Schrödinger equation lies at the heart of understanding molecular and material properties. By adopting a more measured tone, the researchers emphasized that their algorithm is a promising proposal rather than a claimed breakthrough. In what follows, we explain the significance of the Schrödinger equation, the computational obstacles in finding its solutions (especially many excited states), and how the new quantum algorithm offers improved scaling (up to a fourth-power speedup in certain cases) while maintaining a modest outlook on its future impact.

The Schrödinger Equation and Its Computational Challenges

The Schrödinger equation is the cornerstone of quantum mechanics – much like Newton’s laws in classical mechanics – governing how quantum systems behave. In practical terms, solving the Schrödinger equation for a physical system allows scientists to find that system’s eigenvalues (allowed energy levels) and eigenstates (the corresponding quantum states). These eigenvalues are critically important in fields like quantum chemistry, materials science, and spectroscopy, because they determine chemical reaction rates, spectral lines, electronic properties of materials, and more. Even for a single atom, the Schrödinger equation yields a set of energy levels; for more complex molecules or solids, there can be a vast number of such levels.

Finding many eigenvalues (for example, excited-state energies beyond just the lowest energy state) is computationally demanding. Classical algorithms face steep challenges in this area. The size of the mathematical objects involved – typically large matrices representing the quantum system – grows exponentially with the number of particles or the complexity of the system. As Dr. Rajchel-Mieldzioć and colleagues note, determining excited-state energies is often even harder than finding the ground state because it may require resolving a dense spectrum of solutions. In fact, the computational cost for classical methods can scale unfavorably (often polynomially or even exponentially) with the system size, quickly exceeding practical limits. This means that for molecules of modest size or materials with many interacting particles, a full solution of the Schrödinger equation is out of reach with brute-force classical computation. Researchers have developed clever approximation methods and algorithms, but a general efficient solution for many eigenvalues remains a holy grail in computational physics.

A New Quantum Algorithmic Approach

At the Kraków workshop, Dr. Rajchel-Mieldzioć presented a new approach that leverages quantum computing to address the above challenge. The algorithm – developed at BEIT by Rajchel-Mieldzioć, Żak, and Pliś – reframes the task of finding Schrödinger equation solutions as a generalized eigenvalue problem. In simple terms, a generalized eigenvalue problem is a mathematical formulation that often arises when applying certain numerical methods (for instance, the pseudospectral collocation method mentioned by the authors) to physical equations. Solving this problem yields the same desired energy levels of the quantum system. However, the classical solution of a generalized eigenproblem can involve complex linear algebra steps like matrix inversion, which become unstable or infeasible for very large systems or ill-conditioned matrices.

The quantum algorithmic proposal presented bypasses some of these classical bottlenecks by using quantum mechanical computation. In particular, it combines two well-established quantum techniques: Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) and quantum amplitude amplification. QPE is a method that can find eigenvalues of a unitary operator (essentially extracting phase information that encodes an eigenvalue), and amplitude amplification is a way to boost the probability of measuring a desired outcome. By carefully designing a quantum procedure, the team’s algorithm identifies the eigenvalues of the problem by effectively searching for minima in the singular value spectrum of a related matrix. In less technical terms, the quantum computer iteratively adjusts a parameter and uses interference effects to “zero in” on the correct energy values, without needing to directly invert any large matrix.

One of the key claims of this work is a significant improvement in scaling of computational complexity for certain cases. The researchers reported that, for well-behaved cases, their quantum method’s runtime grows much more slowly with system size than the classical counterpart. For example, they highlight a scenario where a classical algorithm might require time scaling on the order of the system size squared (O($N^2$)), whereas the quantum algorithm would scale closer to the square root of the system size (roughly O($\sqrt{N}$)). This difference can be dramatic: as the problem size $N$ grows large, a quantum algorithm with $\sqrt{N}$ scaling would be much faster than a classical $N^2$ approach. In colloquial terms, it’s as if the quantum method could achieve in roughly $N^{1/2}$ steps what a classical method would need $N^2$ steps to do. The team described this as a potential fourth-power speedup in problem size for those specific scenarios. Notably, this is a stronger speedup than the more common quadratic (second-power) speedups seen in some other quantum algorithms, though it applies under particular assumptions about the problem structure (such as smooth or “well-behaved” potential functions in the Schrödinger equation).

Equally important, the algorithm avoids the need to invert matrices, which is a notorious source of numerical instability in classical computations involving generalized eigenvalue problems. By circumventing matrix inversion, the quantum approach is not plagued by large condition numbers (a measure of how error-prone an inversion can be). Instead, the algorithm scans through a one-parameter family of matrices and detects eigenvalues when a certain mathematical condition is met (essentially when a singular value of a transformed matrix drops, indicating an eigen-solution). This strategy is particularly advantageous in situations where one needs multiple eigenvalues or when the problem is ill-conditioned – exactly the situations that challenge classical methods. In summary, the new algorithmic approach introduced at the workshop offers a novel way to utilize quantum computing for finding many energy levels efficiently, with a promise of better scaling and stability in those hard cases.

Significance and Outlook

The presentation in Kraków made it clear that while this new quantum algorithm shows promising results on paper, it is an early step toward practical applications. In their modest appraisal, the researchers stressed that these gains will truly matter only in the era of fault-tolerant quantum computers – that is, when quantum hardware has advanced beyond the noisy, small-scale prototypes we have today. The algorithm requires a quantum computer capable of performing a series of precise operations (including phase estimations) with enough qubits and low error rates. Such hardware is in development worldwide, but it may take years of engineering progress to reliably run algorithms of this complexity on large problems.

If and when such quantum computers become available, the impact of this algorithm could be significant for computational science. Many pressing problems in chemistry, materials design, and even nuclear physics boil down to “solving the Schrödinger equation” for complex systems. For instance, understanding how a biomolecule absorbs light (photodynamics) or how electrons behave in a new material often requires knowledge of many excited-state energies. Classical computational methods struggle with these tasks because of the exponential growth in complexity; only the lowest-energy state can be feasibly obtained for very large systems, and even that often requires approximations. A quantum algorithm that efficiently provides multiple eigenvalues could open the door to simulating high-dimensional molecular systems with dense spectra, meaning systems that have a large number of closely spaced energy levels. This includes challenging scenarios like molecules in excited states, quasi-continuous energy bands in condensed matter systems, or complicated many-body quantum systems. By delivering a set of energy levels more directly, quantum computers might eventually enable scientists to predict chemical reactions or material properties that are currently beyond reach.

It’s important to emphasize the professional humility the team maintained regarding these prospects. Rather than declaring a “quantum revolution” or a definitive solution to all Schrödinger equation problems, Dr. Rajchel-Mieldzioć and his collaborators described their work as an algorithmic advancement that contributes to the growing toolbox of quantum algorithms. They acknowledged that further research and refinement are needed, and that real-world utility will depend on future developments in quantum hardware. This contrasts with some popular accounts of quantum computing breakthroughs; in this case, the tone remained scientific and cautious. The algorithm was presented as a new approach with demonstrated advantages in theory, while inviting the community to verify, test its limits, and explore its applications once technology permits.

Conclusion

The Statistical Physics and Quanta workshop in Kraków provided a platform for showcasing this new quantum algorithm for the Schrödinger equation and discussing its implications with a broad scientific audience. In summary, the algorithm tackles a fundamental problem – computing many eigenvalues of a quantum system – by leveraging quantum computation for improved efficiency and stability. It offers a potential fourth-power speedup in certain scenarios, avoids tricky numerical issues like matrix inversion, and could prove valuable for simulating complex systems with many excited states. These are significant results, but they were conveyed in a careful, neutral manner: as promising research outcomes rather than hyperbolic breakthroughs.

Work like this exemplifies the steady progress happening at the intersection of physics and quantum information science. Each new algorithmic proposal inches us closer to the day when quantum computers might tackle problems in chemistry and materials that classical computers cannot. The researchers’ modest tone serves as a reminder that science advances through incremental achievements and rigorous validation. As the quantum computing field matures, approaches like the one presented by Dr. Rajchel-Mieldzioć and colleagues could become essential tools for exploring the quantum world. Interested readers can find full technical details of this work in the team’s preprint posted on arXiv. For now, their results stand as an encouraging example of how quantum algorithms are being developed to address real-world scientific challenges – one careful step at a time.

Our offices

Poland:

Mogilska 43
31-545 Kraków

Canada:

215 Spadina Ave
Fourth Floor
Toronto

USA:

7757 Baltimore Avenue
Ste 1603

20740 MD College Park

© 2025 BEIT Inc.

Our offices

Poland:

Mogilska 43
31-545 Kraków

Canada:

215 Spadina Ave
Fourth Floor
Toronto

USA:

7757 Baltimore Avenue
Ste 1603

20740 MD College Park

© 2025 BEIT Inc.

Our offices

Poland:

Mogilska 43
31-545 Kraków

Canada:

215 Spadina Ave
Fourth Floor
Toronto

USA:

7757 Baltimore Avenue
Ste 1603

20740 MD College Park

© 2025 BEIT Inc.